Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0482

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive498% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 14 - RZ09-0482  (all builds)
Motherboard PI490
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime24 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 03:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 72.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 258
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 917
83% 697 Pts
64-Core 1340
83% 1340 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1A58 2020) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.49
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.8% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 75.2
37% 48 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 58
Splatting 74.6
46% 52.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4120 4184 4122 4351 4313 2163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
498% Outstanding
Read 2958
Write 4,391
Mixed 3,297
SusWrite 3,876
824% 3,630 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 96.2
320% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 1,033
755% 992 MB/s
Poor: 310%
This bench: 498%
Great: 583%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556S40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 55.4
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 33.4
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 49.4
124% 43.6 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 143%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 39 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0B94
Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0482 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0482

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback