HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant DL380 Gen9  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant DL380 Gen9
Memory122.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 02:08
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 735
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 878
54% 878 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 101
Reflection 101
Parallax 87.2
82% 96.4 fps
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 79.6
75% 86.1 fps
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
797GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2154 2171 2187 2232 2231 2227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2400
Write 2,305
Mixed 2,090
SusWrite 2,200
507% 2,249 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 59.7
203% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 799
581% 764 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 326%
Great: 623%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
370GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1969 1008 833 832 835 835 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,860
SusWrite 1052
419% 1,871 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 63.1
205% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 877
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 759
537% 693 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 253%
Great: 355%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 5.5TB
5TB free
Firmware: 6.60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1098 1099 1095 1098 1096 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 16x8GB
16 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 39.9
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 22" 1280 720 DELD015 DELL E228WFP
Typical ProLiant DL380 Gen9 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: HP ProLiant DL380 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback