MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 575
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 58.5
50% 61.2 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 63
Splatting 57.9
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 74 69 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 126
Write 77.7
Mixed 110
SusWrite 71.6
22% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 23.6
104% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 68.5
64% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 73%
SB2 120GB
43GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 217 56 63 53 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 458
Write 267
Mixed 309
SusWrite 124
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 34.4
143% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 188
165% 242 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
291GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 110 104 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 143
Write 130
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 107
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-20-20 D4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 23.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 24.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 44 165 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback