Lenovo 82WM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive467% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82WM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 20:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 67.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 381
100% 200 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 955
100% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,526
94% 1,526 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C55) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.21
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 11.9
6% 10.2 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 19.9
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51020A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3541 3393 3232 2093 1414 1416 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
467% Outstanding
Read 4,044
Write 3181
Mixed 2,608
SusWrite 2,515
691% 3,087 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 90.9
311% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,420
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,253
936% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 467%
Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC56BG1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 35.2
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 30.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 97%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 16" 1280 720 CSO161B
Typical 82WM Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82WM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback