Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 19:46
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 203
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 629
61% 503 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 96.9
Parallax 136
116% 125 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 117
Splatting 93.5
98% 124 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 108%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 331 136 230 191 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 170
Write 391
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 213
50% 218 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 21.3
63% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 103
135% 245 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 115%
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
437GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 1046 1105 1217 1206 1056 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,760
Write 1,774
Mixed 1,606
SusWrite 1,129
353% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 31.8
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 715
552% 756 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 207%
Great: 349%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
951GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 43 43 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 115
Write 62.3
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 43.2
52% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
868GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 69 71 70 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 87.2
Write 69.7
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 69
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
85% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 153 153 150 133 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65% Good
Read 79.5
Write 119
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 147
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65%
Great: 90%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 73 74 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 47.1
Write 97.7
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 73.4
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
222% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 38
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 22.3
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3CB5 MSI G271
Typical PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $558
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback