Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '23 at 19:44
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112 13,157 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 195 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 480 51% 409 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 9.2 6% 8.2 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 10 Splatting 8.4 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 381 385 385 378 386 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 460 Mixed 428 SusWrite 376 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 50 164% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 271GB free Firmware: 1C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 60 60 61 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 64.7 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 59.7 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 69%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 50 Write 40.7 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 42.3 54% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB 246 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 7.6 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23"	1280 720	PHLC082 Philips 236VL

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	198x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	132x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	78x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369