MSI MEG Z790 ACE (MS-7D86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 379%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 130%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 509%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 135%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics294% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive429% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D86
MotherboardMSI MEG Z790 ACE (MS-7D86)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 18:31
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$499
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 240
2-Core 479
139% 270 Pts
4-Core 951
8-Core 1892
168% 1,422 Pts
64-Core 4,490
278% 4,490 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 135%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Lighting 439
Reflection 420
Parallax 444
358% 434 fps
MRender 557
Gravity 374
Splatting 268
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 294%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2353 2790 3105 3163 3167 3167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
429% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 4,120
Mixed 3,286
SusWrite 2,958
720% 3,167 MB/s
4K Read 80.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 102
327% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 2,016
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 770
677% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 429%
Great: 592%
SDLC2LLR-038T-3NA1 4TB
848GB free
Firmware: 1045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1039 1066 1058 1070 1068 1059 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 758
Write 864
Mixed 778
SusWrite 1,060
196% 865 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 38.7
139% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 307
236% 327 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 153%
Great: 186%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
645GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 1868 1562 1370 1404 1481 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 1,533
Mixed 1316
SusWrite 1,583
346% 1,538 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 50.9
180% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 2213
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 510
555% 990 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 275%
Great: 410%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
114GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 57 54 53 48 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 210
Write 27.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 51.7
82% 82 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
117% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
MC Read 96.8
MC Write 84.6
MC Mixed 83.6
252% 88.3 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 54.1
SC Mixed 36.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 222%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical MEG Z790 ACE (MS-7D86) Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z790 ACE (MS-7D86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback