Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 18:14
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 88
2-Core 155
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 241
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Biostar(1565 170B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.7
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.2
7% 7.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verico SSD 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 402
Mixed 340
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 20.1
93% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 30.1
79% 161 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 92%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
23GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.1
Write 4
Mixed 5.7
13% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR26C16S8K1HU408 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 18.9" 1280 720 DELF005 DELL E198WFP
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback