Lenovo 10A6S2QP00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10A6S2QP00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 17:01
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 173
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 254
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.6% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 81
44% 65 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 44
45% 56.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50zns512g NVMe KIOXIA 512GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11200108 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 884 765 422 415 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,117
Write 1,040
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 616
213% 950 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 56
187% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 704
516% 686 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 170%
Great: 285%
pqi IntelligentStick 4GB
0GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 5.2
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 AOC0CCD 28E850
Typical 10A6S2QP00 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 10A6S2QP00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback