Technovare OPS-TCIS-PS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTechnovare OPS-TCIS-PS  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 14:29
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 94.6
49% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 139
16% 127 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.1
3% 5 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8000NP 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C2.3.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 112 111 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 662
Write 553
Mixed 523
SusWrite 112
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 26.9
103% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 164
127% 173 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 19.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 24 97.5" 1280 720 NEC2DD3 C981Q
Typical OPS-TCIS-PS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Technovare OPS-TCIS-PS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback