Asus X751NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X751NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X751NA
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 12:23
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Memory 30.3
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 58.7
26% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 117
13% 104 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 1770) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 98 99 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 412
Write 101
Mixed 140
SusWrite 94.9
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 14.4
64% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 97.3
DQ Mixed 65.3
63% 99.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unde DGMAS31600004S 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 6% 33 46 9 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1734
Typical X751NA Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X751NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $57
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback