Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-D3H  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 10:47
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$70
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G645 @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 81.4
49% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 98.5
13% 96.4 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 0448) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 49
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 66.3
40% 50.6 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 25.2
28% 35.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SMS100S232G 32GB
28GB free
Firmware: S5FAM011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 84 86 85 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 100
Write 108
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 85.7
22% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 7.6
37% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 39
DQ Mixed 10.2
13% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 28%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
76GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 124 134 135 142 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 166
Write 164
Mixed 149
SusWrite 132
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 17.4
61% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 84.2
DQ Mixed 41.3
37% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 85 48 70 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 83.3
Write 98.6
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 57.2
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
36GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 12 11 12 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
129GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 75 69 73 80 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 73.8
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 45 60 52" 1280 720 HEC0029 HDMI
Typical GA-H77-D3H Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $436
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback