Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 10:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 136
2-Core 224
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 303
38% 291 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 14
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 16
Splatting 15.5
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 1102 1060 331 487 555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,536
Write 1,160
Mixed 875
SusWrite 757
241% 1,082 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 25.2
193% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 356
352% 543 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 191%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 4JQA-0622AD 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1550
Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback