Asrock H410M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H410M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 90.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 241 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 777 78% 632 Pts	64-Core 930 58% 930 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 144 Parallax 135 115% 140 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 143 Splatting 120 104% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 292 294 294 294 295 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 483 Mixed 398 SusWrite 312 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 55.1 183% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 145 144 147 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 146 Write 143 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 144 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C14K4 2x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 20.3 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 30.7 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	0	54.6"	1280 720	TCL6586 TCL SMART TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410M-HVS Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	284x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	242x
Core i5-10400Intel $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	84x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	66x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	27x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	34x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	23x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $328

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16