Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRH-CLN4F
Memory118.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 00:26
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 690
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 2,030
126% 2,030 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1840 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q1.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 122
Parallax 194
100% 147 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 146
Splatting 87
90% 112 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 450
Mixed 416
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 29.7
94% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 115%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
629GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 271 270 265 268 270 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 485
Write 451
Mixed 126
SusWrite 271
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 36.7
92% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3TB free
Firmware: CC96
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 181 179 187 179 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 48
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 180
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
3TB free
Firmware: CC9E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 173 175 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 85.7
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 172
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 113%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 148 150 150 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 141
Mixed 72
SusWrite 148
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 143 144 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 153
Write 146
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 142
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 145 143 143 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 143
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 136 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 118
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 136
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 48
153% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 132%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP2954 HP ZR2440w
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback