Walton TAMARIND EX310G Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWalton TAMARIND EX310G Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardWALTON TAMARIND EX310G Pro
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 22:26
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 116
46% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 184
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Clevo(1558 40D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 287 358 269 288 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 274
Write 231
Mixed 226
SusWrite 254
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 11.6
35% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 169
126% 166 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WT-S8G2666H 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D6
Typical TAMARIND EX310G Pro Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Walton TAMARIND EX310G Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback