Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	10.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '23 at 20:25
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 71.6 1-Core 90 2-Core 175 64% 112 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 504 49% 404 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.8% Good	Lighting 82.5 Reflection 90.8 Parallax 79.5 67% 84.3 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 78.2 Splatting 71.9 66% 82.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 142 55 29 12 34 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,338 Write 855 Mixed 857 SusWrite 93.9 174% 786 MB/s	4K Read 53.6 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 66.7 232% 81.2 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 537 DQ Mixed 217 226% 362 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 209%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 138GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 409 415 406 383 383 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 449 Mixed 394 SusWrite 379 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 50.3 166% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 248 186% 248 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 27.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 32.4 SC Mixed 22.7 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	120	23.5"	1920 1009	AUS2405 ASUS VG24VQR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	493x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	301x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16