HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	HP ZBook Studio G5 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8427
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230925
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 75.5 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 132 58% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 240 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5671 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 192 Parallax 146 118% 161 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 143 Splatting 102 94% 115 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB 6,082 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGHA4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1292 797 789 809 644 578 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,574 Write 1,745 Mixed 1,326 SusWrite 818 307% 1,366 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 49.5 160% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 455 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 357 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 44,819 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.2 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	9%	70	196	59	60	15.5"	1536 793	LGD0618

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

CPU
Core i7-8850HIntelBench 71%, 20,669 samples	258x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	200x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	116x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	405x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	267x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	71x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	151x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	98x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	79x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	119x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	101x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16