Medion H81H3-EM2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion H81H3-EM2  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140630
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 14:08
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 70
2-Core 149
58% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 164
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.8
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 214 224 224 222 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 194
Write 210
Mixed 209
SusWrite 215
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 28.6
110% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 131
115% 170 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
31GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 124 115 120 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 91.6
Write 55.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 119
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
105GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 64 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 54.3
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 63
81% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 31 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0D92 S24D330
Typical H81H3-EM2 Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion H81H3-EM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback