MSI H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E05
MotherboardMSI H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 09:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 620
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1421 MHz, MLim: 1899 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 57.8
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 78.8
47% 66.7 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 64
Splatting 48.5
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme TEAM TM8FP6512G 512GB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3R0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 847 1939 2072 194 992 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 2,030
Mixed 1492
SusWrite 1,315
344% 1,516 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 69.5
225% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 750
568% 766 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 234%
Great: 250%
Ramsta S300 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: P0617A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 332 335 345 344 345 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 340
Write 330
Mixed 256
SusWrite 338
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 10.7
86% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 65.8
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 15.7
60% 126 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLNG43F-DA---------- 8325 GLAG43F-18---------- 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 24.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 26.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 4R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 32% 34 216 60 75 21.5" 1920 1080 VSP2150 iP21501S
Typical H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05) Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI H510M PLUS V3 (MS-7E05)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $608
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback