Biostar A960D+V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V2  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 08:46
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 123
55% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 314
32% 259 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NFS011SA328-6007200 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 52 45 50 46 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.8% Average
Read 251
Write 207
Mixed 221
SusWrite 61.6
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 25.1
90% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 27.6
52% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
668GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 154 153 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 141
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 154
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
15GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 97.6
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.4
245% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 5% 63 47 30 60 0" 1280 720
Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback