Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 20:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 163
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 410
45% 355 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 10.9
5% 9.67 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P709F128G 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0527B0P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 40 37 53 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 799
Write 371
Mixed 430
SusWrite 78.6
92% 419 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 19.7
81% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 250
169% 207 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 26.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 20.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback