Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M S2H  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 159
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 271
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 12.2
11% 11.4 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
45GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 383
Write 323
Mixed 276
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 15.2
59% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 0.3
57% 135 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 55
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27.5" 2560 1369 SAM0C4C U28E590
Typical GA-A520M S2H Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback