Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 18:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 134
47% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 278
29% 231 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 95.7
Reflection 95.1
Parallax 88
78% 92.9 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 76.9
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 381 417 453 452 458 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 464
Mixed 354
SusWrite 409
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 39.2
127% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 336
253% 338 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 189 194 197 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 174
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 194
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
705GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 152 152 151 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 123
Mixed 79
SusWrite 152
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5B73 24GL600F
Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback