Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive414% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 18:27
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 789
76% 629 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 36.5
28% 36.7 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 25.4
26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO 500GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2700 2821 2916 2871 2933 2951 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
414% Outstanding
Read 2,432
Write 2,962
Mixed 2,723
SusWrite 2,865
622% 2,746 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 91
298% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1236
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,073
810% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 414%
Great: 510%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$238
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 441 430 420 442 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 436
Mixed 417
SusWrite 430
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 51.7
170% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 PRO 2TB
465GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2803 2942 2826 2789 625 646 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2,871
Mixed 2,798
SusWrite 2,105
585% 2,592 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 94
305% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 1,120
848% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 269%
This bench: 379%
Great: 449%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 220 233 232 232 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 39.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 38.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 8% 40 219 60 60 23.7" 1280 720 VSCE226 VX2450 SERIES
History: Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B | Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,176
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback