Red KVM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRed KVM  (all builds)
MotherboardRed RHEL
Memory27.8 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 41.8
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 111
44% 76.3 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 592
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 275GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 555 480 499 600 514 256 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat Hat 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15616 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 22.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 1 0 0" 1280 720
Typical KVM Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Red KVM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback