HP 250 G1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1854
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131219
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.6% Poor
Memory 34.7
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 41.8
23% 35.2 Pts
4-Core 51
8-Core 51.3
7% 51.2 Pts
64-Core 13.9
1% 13.9 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 49 45 43 47 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 75.4
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 46.8
16% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 41.1
32% 82.1 MB/s
4K Write 15.9
25% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 11 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMO15A1
Typical 250 G1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback