Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H170-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 17:39
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 129
55% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 208
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Asus(1043 88AE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 200
Parallax 146
126% 167 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
125% 159 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil Z3_128GB 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0105A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 277 328 337 194 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 382
Write 335
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 220
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 1
57% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 60.4
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 15.1
54% 112 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
69GB free
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 112 111 108 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 145
Mixed 30
SusWrite 109
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8RT 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 10.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 60 21.5" 1920 1009 VSCB330 VA2265 SERIES
Typical GA-H170-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback