Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,487 User benchmarks, average bench 44% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 49.3 1-Core 60.2 2-Core 110 43% 73.3 Pts	4-Core 83.4 8-Core 143 14% 113 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 9.4 6% 7.97 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7.4 6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 512GB 639 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN13132 SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 350 361 388 394 392 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 314 Write 362 Mixed 350 SusWrite 376 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 27 95% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 211 155% 202 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 170 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 12.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 9.4 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	0	84.6"	1280 720	HEC002F HISENSE

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16