Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 53.5 35% 50.8 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 157 17% 135 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB 5,630 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 440GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 592 643 709 453 679 648 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 476 Write 458 Mixed 325 SusWrite 620 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 15.9 48% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 334 251% 337 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4642G8CK8IEGKSBG 1x16GB 672 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	195x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	153x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	231x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	117x

SSD
CV8-8E128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 5,529 samples	36x
hynix SC311 SATA 128GBSKBench 65%, 20,313 samples	13x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	11x

RAM
SF4642G8CK8IEGKSBG 1x16GBUnknownBench 41%, 672 samples	46x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 41,676 samples	45x
TMA81GS6AFR8N-UHSC 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,048 samples	32x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16