Asus P5P43TD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5P43TD  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 90.9
46% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 129
Parallax 128
112% 131 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 100
Splatting 96
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 177 197 214 223 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.2% Very good
Read 253
Write 242
Mixed 240
SusWrite 199
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 40.6
130% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 187
140% 186 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
5GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 94 96 39 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 88.2
Write 75.2
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 69.6
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
15GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 115 110 89 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 104
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
141GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 95 92 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 98.8
Mixed 69
SusWrite 90.8
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM778B LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical P5P43TD Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5P43TD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback