Gigabyte H310M A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H310M A
MotherboardGigabyte H310M A  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 04:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 637
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 121
Parallax 92.3
85% 106 fps
MRender 86.6
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 66.4
61% 75.5 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 79 303 103 230 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 388
Write 411
Mixed 329
SusWrite 197
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 33.9
122% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 189
170% 253 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
311GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 115 113 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 172
Write 142
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 115
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-137.A00G 859B CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B5 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-H310M A-CF Builds (Compare 712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte H310M A - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback