Lenovo 82TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82TF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 193
2-Core 368
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,072
109% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,708
106% 1,708 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1369
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 29.7
21% 28.2 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 22.3
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1005P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2143 2170 2244 2365 1070 714 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 3,047
Write 2,285
Mixed 1,529
SusWrite 1,784
482% 2,161 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 74
248% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,336
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 1,000
717% 943 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 348%
Great: 430%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 54.6
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 47.2
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 28
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 16" 1280 720 CSO1613
Typical 82TF Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback