Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170220
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 00:41
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 721
70% 575 Pts
64-Core 1020
63% 1020 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6694) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 149
Parallax 176
132% 162 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 172
Splatting 118
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 212 211 244 254 250 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 244
Write 222
Mixed 140
SusWrite 223
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 0.2
66% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL18-20- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 25.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0852 XF243Y P
Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback