Dell OptiPlex 7070

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7070
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7070  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 20:04
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 144
52% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 540
48% 409 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 092E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 5.6
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F3A A 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 92103061 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 153 115 128 178 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 28.6
Write 191
Mixed 333
SusWrite 130
39% 170 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 11.9
74% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 62
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 248
131% 114 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 25 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76FA LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical OptiPlex 7070 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7070

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback