Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 52.6
2-Core 100
45% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 142
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 46
30% 40.3 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 26.5
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 282 291 304 365 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 330
Write 282
Mixed 264
SusWrite 309
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 0.9
25% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 21.1
46% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 27" 1280 720 MSI4CC3 MSI G271CQP
Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback