Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141127
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 514 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Asus(1043 0464) CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (70^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 37.5 Parallax 46.2 27% 39 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 34.7 Splatting 27 25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 73 86 74 84 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 244 Write 115 Mixed 144 SusWrite 77.7 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 25.8 100% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 85.9 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 97.1 75% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 3 1TB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 763GB free Firmware: ST6OA3BF SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 103 104 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 94.4 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 104 64% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-030.A00LF 2x8GB 360 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 16.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	16	60	19.7"	1280 720	CAS2000 CASPER

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	564x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	387x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	236x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	266x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	208x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	169x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	98x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	100x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	56x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16