Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-G-10G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-G-10G  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP304
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 15:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 198
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 436
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(3100 0006) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.7
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 330 249 243 243 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 327
Write 310
Mixed 320
SusWrite 277
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 35
93% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 281
210% 277 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston RB32D4S2S8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 SHP14C3 LQ156M1JW01
Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-G-10G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-G-10G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback