Asrock X570 Steel Legend

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 07:20
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$126
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 876
90% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,099
68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHT500GB-D8 500GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0709E0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 22 50 360 20 7.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,566
Write 790
Mixed 828
SusWrite 82.5
180% 817 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 25.4
195% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 54.5
138% 287 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 142%
Great: 195%
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 139 141 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 508
Write 390
Mixed 398
SusWrite 164
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 46.5
158% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 99.4
104% 170 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
67GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 89 82 97 95 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 264
Write 130
Mixed 179
SusWrite 93.2
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 35.6
127% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 92.5
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 102
79% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 73%
Team TM8FP6128G 128GB
67GB free
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 78 76 147 118 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,629
Write 502
Mixed 655
SusWrite 134
159% 730 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 43.9
236% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 409
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 358
300% 428 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 164%
Great: 184%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
360GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 84 84 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 68
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 84
88% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 61%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
197GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 72 67 72 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 99.6
Write 97.9
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 70.8
119% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
165% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 65%
WD Drive 2657 2TB
271GB free, PID 2657
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 82.4
Write 93.2
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 76.4
110% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GTZR CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 35.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 45 60 0" 1280 720
Typical X570 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,050
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback