Asrock AB350M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 05:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen: ZD3201BBM4KF4_34/32_Y
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 147
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 464
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1356 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 77.4
48% 65 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 43.1
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S300-512 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 232 242 270 205 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 180
Write 428
Mixed 334
SusWrite 240
68% 296 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 28.9
101% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 140
136% 213 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 135 133 134 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 145
Write 129
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 133
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD3200U1808JG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
90% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 31.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 18.9" 1280 720 SAM0695 SMB1940W
Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback