HP h8-1240t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP h8-1240t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 02:04
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 431
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 97.9
53% 75.3 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 46.7
49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mknssdsr 500GB 500GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 83 3.9 238 64 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 360
Write 322
Mixed 351
SusWrite 126
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 18.1
69% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 33.8
78% 157 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 98 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 76.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 97.5
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Portable 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 113 115 117 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 118
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 114
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
180% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
53GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 4.2 1.9 17 1.9 1.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 139
Write 65.2
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 14.1
87% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
169% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown YXS1866C10D3/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 25" 1280 720 HWP293E HP 2511
Typical h8-1240t Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1240t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback