Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime8 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 01:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 770
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 148
Parallax 120
106% 133 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.4
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 405 363 257 289 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 470
Mixed 377
SusWrite 324
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 41.6
159% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 240
208% 308 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 33.1
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 10 144 27" 1920 1017 AOC2701 27G1G4
Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback