MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 23:05
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 849
79% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,103
68% 1,103 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 172
Parallax 174
86% 150 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 115
Splatting 80.3
78% 97.6 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 160 161 162 162 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 181
Mixed 228
SusWrite 168
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 36.6
155% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 188
164% 248 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 129%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
171GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 586 579 579 591 579 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 2,352
Mixed 1,983
SusWrite 734
401% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 80.8
282% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,344
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,153
872% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 268%
Great: 300%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
96GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 48 49 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 61
Write 59.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 48.6
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 57%
Rsh-319 ASM1153E 3TB
403GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 97 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 163
Write 168
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 96.7
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
90GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 57 55 52 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 75
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 58
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 36.5
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 31.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 43.8" 1280 720 SPT1160 Sceptre T44
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback