Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 23:00
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 1,047
94% 792 Pts
64-Core 2,133
132% 2,133 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 207
Parallax 222
108% 187 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 151
Splatting 97.1
97% 122 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
659GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 55 30 123 102 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 412
Write 357
Mixed 293
SusWrite 118
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 14
70% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 32.2
44% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Wd_black SN850 PS5 1TB
913GB free
Firmware: 615000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,497
Write 3,998
Mixed 3,010
783% 3,502 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 90.3
316% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1613
DQ Write 1,311
DQ Mixed 1,408
1,069% 1,444 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 638%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
171GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 426 295 271 273 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 418
Mixed 327
SusWrite 331
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 44.1
151% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 207
160% 218 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
42GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 104 131 145 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 177
Write 147
Mixed 76
SusWrite 124
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 113%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
150GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 128 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 159
Write 133
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 127
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 77%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
36GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 138 138 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 129
Write 142
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 137
161% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
142% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
31GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 49 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 20.4
Write 49.7
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 48.8
52% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 32%
SAMSUNG HD642JJ 640GB
76GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 49 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 79.8
Write 86.8
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 48.5
87% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 42.7
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 39.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 5 100 33.9" 1280 720 LHC3400 UWQHD-100-C
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback