Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 20:42
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 72
2-Core 149
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 322
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8676) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 170
Parallax 174
139% 172 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 148
Splatting 124
123% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NFS011SA31T-6007000 1TB
656GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1108A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 368 395 83 27 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 391
Write 300
Mixed 317
SusWrite 159
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 21.3
95% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 0.4
60% 140 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 94%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 205 207 204 208 203 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 120 118 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 98.4
Write 118
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 119
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 85.1
Write 95.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 103
118% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
275% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 66%
WD easystore 266A 5TB
505GB free, PID 266a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 66 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 64.1
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 65.8
84% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.6% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 22
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $797
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback