Lenovo 83A2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83A2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 17:52
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 283
89% 168 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 806
77% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3CD7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 21
15% 20.1 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 15.1
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 1215 1173 1058 1142 1168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,118
Write 1,074
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 1,160
247% 1,093 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 55.2
191% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 424
293% 368 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 190%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MF96HAF-3200 Micron MT40A1G16TB-062E:F 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 29.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO439D
Typical 83A2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback