Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive486% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 427
128% 246 Pts
4-Core 841
8-Core 1,525
142% 1,183 Pts
64-Core 1,903
118% 1,903 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 126%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
PowerColor(148C 2418) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 143
Parallax 249
101% 172 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 132
Splatting 156
139% 173 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11382
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3686 3918 2661 1115 1150 1206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
486% Outstanding
Read 4,059
Write 4,085
Mixed 2,539
SusWrite 2,290
727% 3,243 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 97.1
356% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,953
DQ Write 1,402
DQ Mixed 1,620
1,226% 1,658 MB/s
Poor: 255%
This bench: 486%
Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
187% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 70.1
MC Mixed 71.1
190% 66.6 GB/s
SC Read 57.3
SC Write 75.8
SC Mixed 66
190% 66.4 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 187%
Great: 274%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2476 2476WM
Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 396%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 416%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,084
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback