Acer Aspire A315-21

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-21  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Squirtle_SR
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 11:56
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 34.4
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 49.9
24% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 66.3
8-Core 73.1
9% 69.7 Pts
64-Core 69.1
4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Acer(1025 1192) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA470
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 112 121 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 75.8
Write 97.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 120
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA425S6AFR6N-UH HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 6GB
1200, 1200 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO70EC
Typical Aspire A315-21 Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback