Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZI4
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 02:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 185
2-Core 365
108% 208 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,194
113% 939 Pts
64-Core 2,054
127% 2,054 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 275D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 23.7
15% 22.6 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 19.5
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,773
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,817
503% 2,269 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 53.6
183% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 687
490% 638 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 24.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZI4_FX507ZI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback