Asrock A320M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HD  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 02:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 840
82% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.3
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 126
Parallax 160
69% 124 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 151
116% 142 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 3.8 30 28 3.8 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 440
Write 250
Mixed 247
SusWrite 38.5
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 15.2
61% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 34.5
43% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
513GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 145 146 146 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 152
Write 155
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 146
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 29.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 19.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 17% 60 212 59 60 0.7" 1920 1017 STD0001
Typical A320M-HD Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback